| rachel bilson nu :: what size does queen latifah wear |
| Author |
Message |
Carly
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: sexy rachel mcadams actress |
|
|
Subsidize charcoal in the region and sell it for 1/10 of what you get for turning the trees to charcoal. Destroy the charcoal economy. Then pay locals x amount per tree that is there while you point out that the reason that they are poor people living in a wasteland is because they cut the trees in the first place. If that doesn't work, make a guarded tiny tree reserve, close the roads and let them starve themselves to extinction.
What does that have to do with anything in the article? Buried.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Randall
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: rachel nichols sex tape |
|
|
|
“It's all Morgan Freeman's voice.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Lealand
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
That thing looks deadly..
The question is who reads things behind a pay wall? I mean would I go out of my way to see what some one wrote on the WSJ? Or any of the other things that Murdoch owns? It seems to me that people who would go to those places as a primary source of information would already be paying for that content. For 99% of everyone else it just happens to be there, but if it weren't then other media would just as easily fill in. Even if most media companies engaged in that sort of search engine withdrawal, there is enough otherwise that would fill in the hole, even if we are left with commenting over the BBC and the McNeil News hour. The fact is that without compelling content it is hard to make money short of advertising. Google makes a ***** of money because they offer everything, thus offering the widest net possible which they target down in relation to searches. So out of such a huge audience size how much gets routed to things that Murdoch owns? Do you believe if Murdoch takes his ball home to sob that it would do very much to Google's audience? It would seem that such a move would hurt no one but Murdoch himself as he would be removing himself from relevancy in the minds of most people. Cynically I think this is him trying to posture so he can make a deal. That he can throw up enough FUD to make Google scared he might actually pull out and deprive them of his content. However I think he is vastly overplaying his hand and showing just how much of a dinosaur he is. He's going away and in the end the world will be a better place.!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Aji
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: rachel nichols sex tape |
|
|
Elmer's glue also.?
Good idea for an article, but the writing style was painful, or maybe i'm just tired... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Leisk
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: rachel weisz hot pics |
|
|
With his toes. Amazing what you can learn to do as a child.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Valda
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: rachel nichols nude |
|
|
|
It's true, ***** liberals. Republicans will only take your life and piss on your grave.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Petra
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: rachel mcadams adult |
|
|
|
Don't forget ***** YOU DRAGON AGE.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Lenita
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: rachel nichols sex tape |
|
|
|
!
monstersofcock
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Euan
Guest
|
I hate the person who puts inspirational things like "Now and then it's good to pause in our pursuit of happiness and just be happy." and three of their idiot friends gives them the thumbs up. These people aren't deep philosophers, typically they are receptionists with a hunky fireman calendar hanging in their cube. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|